I hesitated when
setting up to write this, because it would be so easy not to get personal with
this blog. I could write a pretty sharp
essay about the similarities between this film and A Streetcar Named Desire. A
huge part of my psyche is screaming "For God's sake, Emily, don't talk
about anxiety. No one wants to read about anxiety. This is a blog
for reviews, so you can show people how much potential
you have as a playwright." But of course, the primary
job of a playwright is to reveal herself on a personal level.
So I'm going to write
about anxiety.
In Blue
Jasmine, Cate Blanchett plays the title character, the former trophy wife
of a brilliantly wealthy financial genius - who turns out to be a
brilliantly wealthy financial criminal. And a cheat.
After the FBI confiscates all her money, Jasmine finds herself heartbroken, broke, disillusioned, and on the verge of a mental breakdown. As she explains, “There’s only so many traumas a person can withstand until they take to the streets and start screaming.” She returns, out of necessity, to the dilapidated home of her sister, Ginger, played by the delightfully sunny Sally Hawkins. (Happy-Go-Lucky, Made in Dagenham). The two sisters, despite each having gone through their share of difficulties, have utterly divergent outlooks on life.
After the FBI confiscates all her money, Jasmine finds herself heartbroken, broke, disillusioned, and on the verge of a mental breakdown. As she explains, “There’s only so many traumas a person can withstand until they take to the streets and start screaming.” She returns, out of necessity, to the dilapidated home of her sister, Ginger, played by the delightfully sunny Sally Hawkins. (Happy-Go-Lucky, Made in Dagenham). The two sisters, despite each having gone through their share of difficulties, have utterly divergent outlooks on life.
Ginger, who worked
bagging groceries while her wealthy sister ignored her for years, is generous
enough to open her home to Jasmine, despite the fact that this prevents her
fiance from moving in with her. Jasmine cannot stop comparing the run-down house
to the mansion she lived in before.
Ginger, who also went through a nasty divorce, has opened her heart to a
new man and is ready to move on. Jasmine
sees no one wealthy enough, successful enough, classy enough, educated enough,
good looking enough… you get it. She is
constantly criticizing Ginger’s admittedly
imperfect fiance, even to the point where Ginger starts to have her own
doubts.
But Jasmine isn't
really a nasty person. Jasmine is living
with acute anxiety. Living with anxiety feels like the layer of skin just below the surface is constantly
vibrating. You wake up in the middle of
the night or early in the morning with your heart pounding and a million
frightening thoughts running through your mind.
“Is my neighborhood safe enough?
Do my friends really like me? Am
I doing well enough at my job/school? Is my relationship on stable grounds?”
And then there are the really frightening thoughts. “Is the world around me one great lie? Am I lying to myself? Am I really happy? Do my loved ones really love me, or are they
just pretending? Am I just pretending to
love them?”
We live in an unstable
world. As Blue Jasmine portrays, we’re in an economic crisis caused, in part,
by unethical business practices. Politicians,
financial institutions, and other powers we trusted have deceived us on
numerous occasions. Our climate is
changing, and no one really knows what to do about it. On the personal level, the
people we love sometimes don’t love us back.
To top it all off, our culture’s expectations
for quality of life are going up and up, to the point where many find
it difficult to be satisfied with what earlier generations would have deemed enough.
I don’t know about you,
but I see this especially played out in our relationships. This is where my anxiety has recently
settled. (It hasn't always settled
there.) My grandparents, both sets,
married very young by today’s standards. They were not necessarily financially
stable by today’s standards. I can’t say
for certain, but I’m guessing they probably weren't Hollywood good-looking at
the time. I’m also guessing - and this is just a guess so please correct me if
you happen to be my grandparent reading this - that they weren't passionately “in-love”
by today’s standards. What I mean by that is they probably
weren't running-through-an-airport-quoting- the-Notebook-never-had-a-doubt-you’re-my-soulmate-you’re-perfect-no-work-involved-the-end
“in love.” I’m certain they don’t feel that way now. But my grandparents, both sets, still seem
like each other’s best friends. They
still seem to like each other a lot.
They still seem to love each other in a quiet way, which is more than I
can say for most other couples I've seen.
So how does this relate to Blue
Jasmine?
At the top of the film,
we hear Jasmine describing to a stranger on a flight the way she felt when she
first met her husband, Hal. (Played by the ever-more-impressive Alec Baldwin.)
Hal, she describes “swept her off her feet.”
They have a song together. She
just knew. He was The One. To top it off, he also happened to be filthy rich and good looking. He
buys her all kinds of crazy presents. He
is the perfect guy. Except that it turns
out he never stopped cheating on her and most of his money was stolen. So it would seem that all of Jasmine’s
initial instincts were, maybe, wrong. She
picked the wrong guy. She made a
mistake.
Or did she?
Is the problem actually not the man at all,
but the criteria by which she judged
him? For myself, I feel a great pressure
to judge my mates by Hollywood standards.
I feel like we should have a song.
I feel like I should look across the room and “just know.” This pressure comes partly from society, but
I also largely from myself.
I find myself looking at perfectly good relationships my friends have
and thinking “oh he is so quiet/loud/skinny/fat/whatever. She could totally do better.” This is the root of anxiety. Good is never enough. Reasonable advice such as “don’t settle for
someone who doesn't treat you well or who you don’t love,” has morphed
into “don’t settle for anyone that isn't perfect in every way and who you’re
not so in love with that you will chase them through an airport to keep them
from leaving.” Note that I am
contrasting love and “in-love” in
this statement. Feel free to disagree
with me in the comments.
The modern, anxious,
mind, has a tough time being happy. It
has a tough time knowing when it truly loves another person. It just has a tough time connecting with
people. What makes Blue Jasmine a great film, in my opinion, is that is challenges
society’s deeply help value of “never enough.”
The movie isn't about how Jasmine fell for the wrong guy and moved on
until she found the “right” guy. It’s
about how her conception of right and wrong so drastically contrasts with that
of her sister.
In one of the most
telling lines of the movie, Jasmine
shouts at Ginger “You choose losers because that’s what you think you
deserve and that’s why you’ll never have a better life.” This sounds reasonable, but what do we
consider a “loser” by today’s standards? Flawed human being? Average job?
Average looking? Not the guy from
The Notebook? (Or the original fiance from The Notebook, who actually
was a pretty good guy, right?)
Ginger doesn't choose losers because she doesn't
think she can do better, she chooses the best of the average guys that come her
way and make her happy. As Ginger
describes, the better guys just aren't beating down her door. And when a guy does come along that seems
like a step up, he turns out to be a liar as well. Rather than wallowing in self-pity, Ginger
returns to her fiance, happier again to have him back.
Hal may be highly
romantic, and he may have made Jasmine feel madly in-love, but he ultimately
did not care about her or any of the people he came in contact with. In contrast, the most romantic thing Chili
says in the entire film is probably “Some of the stuff she said made me really
mad, but I kept it on the inside.” It might not seem like much, but
this means he cares enough about Ginger to try to improve himself and his
temper. So I’ll take it. And she seems comfortable enough with herself
to realize that a mate isn't a status symbol and how much you laugh with
someone may be just as important, if not more, than how many butterflies he
gives you.
I get Jasmine. I've spend a lot of time in high anxiety
worried about whether I have the perfect relationship. It’s hard not to, looking at the divorce rate
in our society. Look at what Hollywood
teaches us about love. (They are
probably connected.) But then I look at my grandparents and I look at Ginger,
and I think...
I’m so lucky that my
guy took me to see Blue Jasmine.
It’s
probably okay if I don’t marry that dude from The Notebook.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteEmily, this is just wonderful! Thank you for sharing this insightful post with us. You're a rock star.
ReplyDeleteThis is wonderful. I wholeheartedly agree x
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteA while back there was a book entitled "The Message is the Media". The title periodically pops up in my mind and causes pause for reflection.
"Is" is a linking verb and so if you turn the book title around you have "The Media is the Message". And so, I think your blog hit the nail on the head. Media in all its forms has the power to transform society.
Just to note also that Individual Person is media and so, too, has power to transform the bit of society that he/she interacts with daily. Aunt Marilyn
This is so relevant to what I am talking about! The media has valued romanticism for so long, that the cultural messages about love have become warped. I think that anxiety is caused, in part by a cultural messages ingrained in your subconscious conflicting with an inner wisdom that is also in there. The resulting battle can only feel like panic.
DeleteI simply hope that this little piece of media here may at least crack the door open to a dialogue about this.
First and foremost, you're welcome ;-)
ReplyDeleteSecond, I know we talked extensively about the movie afterwards but the similarities between this film and Streetcar really started to bubble in my head after that. Then I read your blog, and a review of the movie on Vulture.com focusing on that aspect. It think it shows the genius of Woody's writing to adroitly adapt an American classic to modern times without making it a hamfisted ripoff or a morality play about the Great Financial Crisis and also the brilliance of Cate Blanchett's performance, who I also learned from the aforementioned Vulture essay played Blanche on Broadway in the recent past.
Finally, I think you've struck with great insight into one of the main drivers of unhappiness, stress, and even macroeconomic crises. You wrote about our culture's expectations of the exponential growth of quality of life, and while I'll save you the Austrian analysis that builds upon this, I'll just leave it at when people expect things that they do not desire to work for, great problems occur.
Thank you for your insightful comments. Its incredible how an expectation that life will be perfect, comfortable, and easy in every way naturally leads us to feel disappointed when anything isn't right. It's probably unfair for me to speculate, but this ingrained culture of dissatisfaction has got to have some effect on our marriages and dating relationships. We simply won't tolerate any level of imperfection in the realm of forever. This is not to say that there aren't plenty of completely valid reasons why our divorce rate is so high. More people are leaving unbearable relationships, which is absolutely good. But I also think more people are leaving good relationships with the intent to search for an elusive "better" which is probably more like "perfect."
DeleteThere is a great TED Talk about this called "The Paradox of Choice." (The politics are very different from yours, but the point is the same, proving this problem spans all ideologies.)
http://www.ted.com/talks/barry_schwartz_on_the_paradox_of_choice.html
Also, here is the url for the review you cited:
http://www.vulture.com/2013/07/movie-review-blue-jasmine.html
I've read this post about 4 or 5 times to try and gather my thoughts and I still don't think I have them together very well, but I'm going to try anyway... There was something kind of unsettling to me about what you wrote here when I first read it. I think a lot of that does result from those ideas of the perfect relationship foisted upon us and as I've thought about it this week, that idea appeals so much because it means there isn't any work involved in making it succeed. That being said, I do think there are more levels of being "in-love" than the chase-through-an-airport variety. It may be a bit of semantics, but I think there's a difference between just love and being in-love... the difference between how I feel towards my friends and how I would feel toward the person I want to spend the rest of my life with. Not necessarily something perfect, but definitely something deeper.
ReplyDeleteI've thought a lot about this over the last week and I think it will be particularly interesting going forward and discovering all the aspects of my life where these overgrown expectations lie... And then seeing if there's anything I can do about it. Also, I really want to watch this movie now... it sounds great :)
I highly recommend you sneak a bottle of wine into the theater and enjoy accordingly
ReplyDeleteEmily,
ReplyDeleteI think this is one of your best blogs and Woody Allen would be very pleased! You have always had a skill of deciphering the complexities and rooting out the heart of the matter in most stage productions or movie.
Your message became more poignant, however, when you revealed a part of yourself. Everyone struggles with something and revealing that struggle makes your perspective more real and powerful. Thank you for allowing us to know Blue Jasmine and yourself more clearly.